Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gwjack

NBC - In a potentially lethal blow to Obamacare, a federal appeals court has ruled that the federal government may not subsidize health insurance plans bought by people in states that decided not to set up their own marketplaces under Obamacare.

The law clearly says that states are to set up the exchanges. But 34 states opted not to, and the federal government took over in those states. The court ruled that federal government may not pay subsidies for insurance plans in those states.


38 posted on 07/22/2014 7:45:03 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Oldeconomybuyer

It would be fantastic if the courts ruled that the states had to set up the plans. We the People have a direct line to our state government and can keep them from capitulating. We’ll have an open state vs fedgov showdown.


128 posted on 07/22/2014 8:20:35 AM PDT by demshateGod (The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

“...The law clearly says that states are to set up the exchanges. But 34 states opted not to, and the federal government took over in those states. The court ruled that federal government may not pay subsidies for insurance plans in those states.”
***************************************************************************************

And the panel’s decision also ruled that EMPLOYERS (in non state-exchange states) may not be penalized for not offering insurance. This will become yet another factor in encouraging employers to abandon BLUE STATES that set up exchanges and move to the states that refuse to set up state exchanges. Of course, there are a handful of RINO Ruled states such as Ohio who STUPIDLY set up state exchanges and will suffer for those stupid actions.

Just as the ruling adds additional reasons for EMPLOYERS to migrate from state exchange states to non-state exchange states, so the ruling will add additional reasons to encourage low income, government dependent INDIVIDUALS to migrate in the opposite direction. It serves those BLUE/RINO state their just deserts.


170 posted on 07/22/2014 8:47:59 AM PDT by House Atreides (ANOTHER CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICAN FOR CHILDERS 2014 .... Don't reward bad GOPe behavior.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

The law is unambiguous on this point.


171 posted on 07/22/2014 8:48:04 AM PDT by CityCenter (Resist Obamacare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson