“...Clearly the law was written sloppily, to have this major oversight in it. We know what the intention was with the subsidies. But, the court to their credit was reading and interpreting the actual text of what the law say...”
**************************************************************************************
Actually, the “INTENT” was to financially almost force the states to set up exchanges. Little did the dumb-ass democRATS who passed this law with zero Republican votes realize that many states would essentially rebel and NOT set up a state exchange.
And now the DemocRATS say that the clear and precise language in the law does not mean what it clearly says.
After all the litigation is over and if the subsidies are finally ruled illegal, they will have to be paid back. There will be hell to pay when that happens.