Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jane Long
That's not how I read the suit. From the article:

Johnson argued that the Obama administration decision to allow the government to contribute to staffers’ and members’ health costs was not allowed under the Affordable Care Act. He said his injury was that the policy put him at an unfair disadvantage with his voters and required him to file a form distinguishing staff and non-staff. Griesbach said that was not enough.

Sounds like he was trying to find a way to show injury. Because the government is contributing to his staffers health care costs, that put them at an advantage over regular Americans.....Thus, it put him at an unfair disadvantage with his voters because they wouldn't like that.

Maybe, I'm wrong, but that's the way I read it.
9 posted on 07/22/2014 6:10:54 AM PDT by Girlene (Hey NSA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Girlene

Thanks, Girlene...I need to re-read....after another cup of coffee ;-)


10 posted on 07/22/2014 6:16:56 AM PDT by Jane Long ("And when thou saidst, Seek ye my face; my heart said unto thee, Thy face, LORD, will I seek")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Girlene

Exactly - ridiculously weak argument.


19 posted on 07/22/2014 9:32:31 AM PDT by expat2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson