The obvious question is why should students who go to elite schools with high tuition be subsidized by blue collar workers who don’t go to college. I vote no. Emphatically. Just more government subsidization of debt which encourages higher tuition, that ends up in the pockets of liberals, and more debt. Looney tunes unless the reporting is wrong.
And more reckless borrowing, to boot. When you subsidize something, you will get more of it.
An obvious precedent to that question is the issue of how the federal government finds being in the loan business, to be among its enumerated powers.
-- ... more government subsidization of debt which encourages higher tuition, that ends up in the pockets of liberals, and more debt. --
Rubio sees giving away public money as a path to electoral success.