[LucianOfSamasota]

Holder was held in contempt regarding discovery for Fast and Furious.

First, the DOJ answered Congress with a FALSE written official response.

This response was demonstrated to be intentionally inaccurate, and Holder ‘withdrew’ the written response.
(Remember that if you’re ever accused of perjury you can ‘withdraw’ your blatant, unrepentant lies).

Then Holder REFUSED to comply with Congressional Subpenas, eventually claiming ‘Executive Privilege’ in a matter of which the Executive claimed to have no knowledge.

Then contempt charges were filed, but the Federal attorney for DC, COMPLICIT IN TREASON, refused to honor Congress or the law by prosecuting Holder.

This has been the state of affairs for three years?

[SeekAndFind]

RE: the Federal attorney for DC, COMPLICIT IN TREASON, refused to honor Congress or the law by prosecuting Holder.

So, why can’t they hold the Federal attorney in contempt as well?