Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: C19fan
The Editorial Pages of the WSJ is one of the biggest supporters of open borders.

It's entirely true, what you write.

The normally courageous, conservative, and correct WSJ editorial page has somehow lost every smidgeon of clear thinking when it comes to illegal aliens.

They just do not see illegals being the pathway to Dem tyranny, which it absolutely is.

.

23 posted on 07/09/2014 9:20:27 AM PDT by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Seaplaner
20 years ago, a local commentator said the issue wasn't left versus right but elite versus 'commomer,' what has been called "Country versus Court" by historians.

The WSJ can't help themselves...they have some romantic notion of immigrants which may have been true once, in some world at some point in history. They follow the siren song of 'Noblesse Oblige.'

They have no notion of the consequences of defacto open borders which we endure daily. Besides, where will all the reasonably priced landscapers, maids and nannies come from?

32 posted on 07/09/2014 10:11:25 AM PDT by gogeo (If you are Tea Party, the Republican Party does not want you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson