Posted on 07/08/2014 4:44:49 PM PDT by dontreadthis
Right, but in the second alternative, the amendment process is initiated, run, and ratified by the states. After the "Application of the Legislatures of two-thirds of the several States," Congress' role to "call a Convention" is merely clerical or administrative.
I agree.
Even more important would be the CSPAN gavel-to-gavel coverage. Rush Limbaugh would have a field day. The details of possible amendments would be the main topic of conversation at dinner tables, churches, town meetings and bars across the country. (Note that at the time of the adoption of the Constitution, the pub played an important role in both male bonding and politics.)
The most important thing to be gained is that the people would no longer fear an Amendments Convention as a tool of governance. They would see good order and spirited debate. From the first day of proceedings, heroes and villains would emerge.
And that brings me to the greatest gain to be had from a successful Amendments Convention. The political parties, the corporate interests and Congress would be on notice that the people have found a way around them.
Excellent. Thank you.
It will be difficult for the dino media to ignore, but I don't underestimate them.
The reason we have an invasion of potential Democrat voters on our southern border is to close the window on Article V: To lock us into socialism forever.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.