Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/03/2014 6:33:24 AM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SJackson
At least Obama will not be able to bring anything in front of SCOTUS when he is not president as his law license was receded shortly after it was issued.
2 posted on 07/03/2014 6:36:42 AM PDT by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

Obama has demonstrated that he doesn’t give one, let alone two, hoots about what any court in the US thinks.

The only thing that will stop him is impeachment and conviction; even then the military would probably have to forcibly remove Moochelle’s over-sized rear from Air Force One.

Regrettably, the Republican “leadership” in DC is hoping to tiptoe past all of the Obama scandals to ensure majorities in the House and Senate this November. My view is that it won’t happen—Open warfare against your base is never a good idea.


3 posted on 07/03/2014 6:42:08 AM PDT by Arm_Bears (Rope. Tree. Politician. Some assembly required.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

Beware links that start loud ads that can’t be stopped w/o accidentally launching new links.


5 posted on 07/03/2014 7:26:37 AM PDT by Tanniker Smith (Rome didn't fall in a day, either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
The Supreme Court [...] Doing its job for a change

An 'extremist' trend according to the left.

7 posted on 07/03/2014 7:46:34 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson



8 posted on 07/03/2014 7:47:46 AM PDT by MeshugeMikey ( "Never, never, never give up". Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

It is very important that conservatives question Republican presidential candidates about the powers of the office of the presidency. Would they be willing to work with congress to strongly restrain the presidency from engaging in unconstitutional acts?

If they say no, that they are wise enough to use the power wisely, they are wrong, and should be rejected. It is like a cocaine user saying that they are not addicted, they can quit anytime they like. The problem is not their strength of character, but that they snort cocaine in the first place.

Just give them a list of 10 assumed, not constitutional, presidential powers:

1) Outlaw land grabbing “presidential proclamations”, and ask congress to give the bulk of western lands back to the states.

2) Outlaw the use of “presidential signing statements” on new laws, in that they usurp both congressional and judicial powers.

3) Prohibit the appointment of “Czars” and recess appointments outside of an actual recess, and limited in duration to just the length of the recess. When the recess is over, the nominee appears before the senate, without further delay.

4) Create strict, mandatory guidelines for any declaration of “executive privilege”.

5) A full restoration of the Posse Comitatus Act. The US military is *not* to be used for any internal police matter.

6) A full restoration of the War Powers Act. Refusal to follow the timetable of the Act should result in the automatic loss of funding for all unapproved military actions.

7) Regulatory Agency De-militarization Act, to take away guns and SWAT teams from non-military, non-police federal agencies (currently proposed by Congressman Chris Stewart (R-UT)with a dozen co-sponsors.) Consolidation of the 100+ federal police agencies into about a dozen.

8) Structural reorganization of the federal judiciary to eliminate bottlenecks, most secret courts, and the diminution of civil rights through stare decisis (precedent).

9) Create a standing congressional committee whose purpose is to dismantle government agencies not authorized in the constitution, and to strip unconstitutional powers assumed by such agencies.

10) Make the last push for a balanced budget and line item veto amendment.


9 posted on 07/03/2014 7:55:06 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy ("Don't compare me to the almighty, compare me to the alternative." -Obama, 09-24-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

Kudos to the author of this for linking in the full text of the supreme court decisions. I wish more people would actually read them, rather than have the mediots telling them what they say.


10 posted on 07/03/2014 8:29:40 AM PDT by zeugma (It is time for us to start playing cowboys and muslims for real now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

That would-be dictator usurped his Constitutional boundaries a long time ago. Congress has totally failed their duty to protect our representative form of democracy.


11 posted on 07/03/2014 9:10:42 AM PDT by TexasRepublic (Socialism is the gospel of envy and the religion of thieves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson