That’s a good point. One answer is this; notice how the left mixes legal and illegal “immigration” in terms?
They want to blur the lines.
We all know these tech companies truly don’t need that many foreigners to write basic code. They just don’t want to spend their money working to get Amercians into the tech market. They know they are lazy and stupid and our education system turns out morons.
Live by liberalism, die by liberalism.
It isn’t like they don’t move their tech support and writing to China or India already.
I’m supposed to worry about billionaires making more money?
That’s a good point. One answer is this; notice how the left mixes legal and illegal “immigration” in terms?
They want to blur the lines.
We all know these tech companies truly don’t need that many foreigners to write basic code. They just don’t want to spend their money working to get Amercians into the tech market. They know they are lazy and stupid and our education system turns out morons.
They want to blur the lines.
We all know these tech companies truly don’t need that many foreigners to write basic code. They just don’t want to spend their money working to get Americans into the tech market. They know they are lazy and stupid and our education system turns out morons.
*******
Those pro-amnesty people are very clever: They mix legal immigration with illegal immigration. They say something like this:
"We need highly skilled tech workers, landscapers, and restaurant workers like MacDonald workers, so we must legalize all the 11 million illegals already here." What a bunch of crap.
Let me see if I have this right: Tech companies argue that we need the brightest techs from places like South Korea, China, Taiwan, and India so that we can compete against smart people in South Korea, China, Taiwan, and India?
Say what? If we get the brightest from those countries, then it means that people in those countries are competing against themselves. So who is left in those countries to compete against those techs that moved to the US? How crazy is that?
I can hear the tech teachers in Asia telling their students: "A tech background is the quickest way to get a green card and become an American citizen. Then Later you can bring the rest of your family to the US." What crap.
And then this happens: Those bright people leave the companies to start their own tech companies, and the vicious cycle of recruiting foreign Asian tech workers start all over again.
NOTES:
1. European techs: have you noticed that most of the new techs come from Asia, especially India? Why is that? What is wrong with European techs? Aren't they smart enough?
Let's be honest: If I told you that most of the new techs would come from Latin American countries like Mexico and Brazil instead of from Asia, you would laugh in my face.
2. Microsoft: We must demand that tech companies like Microsoft set up programs---has Microsoft and other tech companies ever heard of internships---to recruit American tech workers, many of them unemployed but anxious and eager to work and learn.
3. "immigrants do jobs that Americans won't do": I can't think of many tech jobs, especially entry level tech jobs, Americans won't do.
4. Statue of Liberty: We should point it towards Asia, and instead of saying "Send us you poor...", we should inscribe something like this:"Send us your smartest and brightest tech people and your richest people who speak English..." Sarcasm.
5. German techs: I bet that if the US government said that the vast majority of new techs would now come from Germany instead of Asia, the American public would suddenly become very scared, and they would protest that we can't have all these Germans here because they would try to take over the country and start a war.
Asian countries would protest that if the US limited the flow of techs from Asia, they wouldn't have any room for all the techs that their schools are now graduating and thought they were going to the US.