I was trying to say, diplomatically, that you do not have a clue what you are talking about.
You have force the issue, so I will say it directly: YOU ARE WRONG AND YOU DO NOT HAVE A CLUE WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT!
Typical liberal ad hominem attack. Please show me either from the decision itself or one decent well known commentator that will support the assertion that the SC just agreed that life starts at conception.
This issue was not about when life begins. It was about giving for profit corporations the same religious liberties and protections that nonprofit and religious groups have.
It also did not free anyone for paying for birth control or abortion since it will still be available for no additional charge by forcing insurance companies to offer it at no charge which will be paid for either by government subsidy or increased premiums passed on as a cost of doing business like a tax.
In essence this was a shell game and Ginsburg got it right. If you pay any health insurance premiums at all you will be subsidizing birth control or abortions. Ditto If you pay federal taxes.