Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING: Court Sides With Hobby Lobby
Townhall ^ | Jun 30, 2014 | Christine Rousselle

Posted on 06/30/2014 7:24:29 AM PDT by george76

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last
To: george76

religious freedom won by a slim one vote margin. Praise God for that! I hope this is the beginning of a very sick nation turning back to our Creator and God!


21 posted on 06/30/2014 7:31:07 AM PDT by 2nd Amendment (Proud member of the 48% . . giver not a taker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

22 posted on 06/30/2014 7:31:07 AM PDT by JPG (Yes We Can morphs into Make It Hurt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allendale

Does this mean that slut Fluke has to buy her own condoms?/S


23 posted on 06/30/2014 7:31:24 AM PDT by 9422WMR ("Ignorance can be cured by education, but stupidity is forever.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: george76

This is a MASSIVE victory for freedom!

The Authoritarians (aka the Liberals/Leftist) will downplay this and try to spin it as a victory.

Don’t listen to their B.S. spin. This is HUGE!


24 posted on 06/30/2014 7:31:53 AM PDT by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: V_TWIN

When 5-4 decisions go to the conservatives, NPR and the NYT say the Court was “bitterly divided.” When 5-4 decisions go the liberals they say the decision was “closely decided.”


25 posted on 06/30/2014 7:32:17 AM PDT by tellw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JPG

Looks like the passengers on the Titanic celeberating getting to move a deck chair from port to starboard.


26 posted on 06/30/2014 7:33:26 AM PDT by Gadsden1st
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: tellw; V_TWIN

We are on the edge my friend... the decision was 5-4.

All we need is for (God Forbid) one of the conservative to die or retire before 2016 and we’ll have another Ginsberg on the bench.

With that, 5-4 will be THE OTHER WAY AROUND.


27 posted on 06/30/2014 7:34:13 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: george76
A good decision, but not broad and sweeping. Said "closely held corporations," in which a few stockholders control more than 50%. Doesn't exempt, say, Ford. Isn't a broad strike-down of the "mandate."

Still, it's a surprise. Moreover, when combined with the VERY strong blow against the unions, we must celebrate.

The caution here is that, as @bensmith said on Twitter, "The SCOTUS has a bad habit of infringing freedom broadly then making exemptions narrowly."

28 posted on 06/30/2014 7:34:28 AM PDT by LS ('Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually.' Hendrix)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76
This is a very minor victory for the pro choice side.

A tiny exception to the governments sweeping power grab.

Kennedy already laid down a marker that he believes the government can cover the cost of the objectionable types of contraception. Implying he will dissent on a broader case.

And the four communists on the court want the bureaucrats to have absolute power to rule.

29 posted on 06/30/2014 7:35:14 AM PDT by oldbrowser (We have a rogue government in Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WashingtonSource
Glory! Glory! Hallelujah!

But and this is a But as big as Moochelle's...its narrowly tailored to companies largely controlled by a few believers. One step forward. A baby step for sure. Elections have consequences and if we don't control the senate next term Obama will appoint, Marx, Engels, Mao and Castro or their surrogates to the sure to be created openings on the high court.

30 posted on 06/30/2014 7:35:19 AM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: george76

Those who object to the HobbyLobby ruling can just find a job someplace else.
Why would any die-hard, G-d-less liberal want to work at a business that does not support their death cult anyway?
PTL and
Glory to God for victories large and small.


31 posted on 06/30/2014 7:35:45 AM PDT by two23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tellw

In the Authoritarians (aka Liberals/Leftist) when they lose standard ops is to say it was close like in 2000 election.

However, when they win... they never mention how close the vote was like in Mississippi.


32 posted on 06/30/2014 7:36:02 AM PDT by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: george76

Guardedly celebratory ... I’d like to read the opinions to see how broad this is.

If broad enough, it may set a precedent that also protects businesses from having their religious freedoms overridden by homosexuals.


33 posted on 06/30/2014 7:36:23 AM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

Shocking that Justice Kennedy would be on our side for this one but you got to take whatever victory you can get against the left.


34 posted on 06/30/2014 7:36:26 AM PDT by dowcaet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bucky14

“We won. Get over it!”

Yeah, that chaps my azz every time I think about that.


35 posted on 06/30/2014 7:36:33 AM PDT by V_TWIN (white pri)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: george76

“While still a legal victory for Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp., the decision is limited to closely-held for-profit corporations, not non-profits such as Little Sisters of the Poor.”


36 posted on 06/30/2014 7:37:09 AM PDT by nuconvert ( Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

37 posted on 06/30/2014 7:38:05 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76
Will this decision have any effect on Obamacare premiums that include fees to cover contraception? It would seem that if it's unconstitutional for a corporation to be forced to pay then it would also be unconstitutional for individuals to be forced to pay. What about tax-payer-funded coverage (for those who are covered at little or no cost to themselves)?
38 posted on 06/30/2014 7:39:20 AM PDT by DeakonSmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gadsden1st
Looks like the passengers on the Titanic celeberating getting to move a deck chair from port to starboard

Lol. Feels that way, too.

39 posted on 06/30/2014 7:41:00 AM PDT by dware (3 prohibited topics in mixed company: politics, religion and operating systems...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: george76

Thank you, Lord.

We prayed and You answered.

Watch over our Nation and guide it back to You.


40 posted on 06/30/2014 7:44:35 AM PDT by exit82 ("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson