Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet
One small step for man...
2 posted on
06/30/2014 7:23:03 AM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
("The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the government." --Tacitus)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
To: 2ndDivisionVet
And Obama swings again...AND ANOTHER STRIKE!
4 posted on
06/30/2014 7:23:39 AM PDT by
apillar
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Religious can breathe for another day
5 posted on
06/30/2014 7:23:44 AM PDT by
yldstrk
( My heroes have always been cowboys)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Watch for a very active PEN and PHONE day ... Obama has warned us!
To: 2ndDivisionVet; Tax-chick; GregB; Berlin_Freeper; SumProVita; narses; bboop; SevenofNine; ...
7 posted on
06/30/2014 7:24:05 AM PDT by
NYer
("You are a puff of smoke that appears briefly and then disappears." James 4:14)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I believe I saw that the definition of “closely held” is that 5 or fewer people hold a majority of the ownership.
8 posted on
06/30/2014 7:24:21 AM PDT by
kevkrom
(I'm not an unreasonable man... well, actually, I am. But hear me out anyway.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
9 posted on
06/30/2014 7:24:24 AM PDT by
Raycpa
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Sandra Fluke is sad that she might have to spend $9 of her own money to get contraception.
10 posted on
06/30/2014 7:24:39 AM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(Haven't you lost enough freedoms? Support an end to the WOD now.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Someone who knows please tell us what this means in the larger sense. Does this give standing to others to exempt themselves from the ACA on other grounds?
11 posted on
06/30/2014 7:24:41 AM PDT by
skeeter
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Good. A punch in the chops for 0 bummer. He can take a flying leap at a rolling donut and hope the POS hits the hole. F him.
12 posted on
06/30/2014 7:24:50 AM PDT by
Arrowhead1952
(The Second Amendment is NOT about the right to hunt. It IS a right to shoot tyrants.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Roberts trying to make amends.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Supreme Court's war on women.
/sarc
18 posted on
06/30/2014 7:25:55 AM PDT by
Jagdgewehr
(It will take blood.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Yet another 5-4 decision. Thankfully, they’ve ruled properly, but God help us if one of the conservatives on the court dies.
21 posted on
06/30/2014 7:26:22 AM PDT by
ScottinVA
(If it doesn't include border security, it isn't "reform." It's called "amnesty.")
To: 2ndDivisionVet; 185JHP; 230FMJ; AKA Elena; APatientMan; Albion Wilde; Aleighanne; ...
That bitter howling and screaming you hear is from the leftists who hate this good news of goodness and decency.
Moral Absolutes Ping!
Freepmail Responsibility2nd or wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list. FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search [ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
22 posted on
06/30/2014 7:26:43 AM PDT by
Responsibility2nd
(NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Let me guess. A 5 to 4 decision?
To: 2ndDivisionVet
The media would have us believe this is about birth control pills. Hobby Lobby covers those. The objection was to the “morning after pills” and such that actually kill a possible live fetus. No one should be forced to pay for someone to kill or possibly kill an unborn child.
24 posted on
06/30/2014 7:27:40 AM PDT by
Hattie
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Finally, some sanity from the Supreme Court!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson