To: utahagen
All you’ve got to do is compare photos of Hubbell and Chelsea Clinton, it becomes more obvious with every passing year. Depending upon how one views the matter, either Foster had some latent instability or was in their eyes not trustworthy. There’s your reason for Hubbell instead of Foster. Not to mention, Hillary is widely regarded as not being particularly into men, so physical charms may well have been lost upon her.
To: RegulatorCountry
“...so physical charms may well have been lost upon her.” It's one thing not to mind if the man you sleep with isn't handsome; it's another to deliberately choose a very homely man to be the biofather of your child. When couples look at egg donors, the looks of the donor are the #1 consideration, with even intelligence being so far behind that it doesn't matter. I'm not saying that's wise, but it is the way it is. I guess I should amend my opinion thus: I don't believe HRC would deliberately have a child with Webb Hubbell, but perhaps she got pregnant by accident.
67 posted on
06/30/2014 7:06:31 AM PDT by
utahagen
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson