[Dilbert San Diego]

I still don’t understand, and may never understand, how it is that the liberals had a meltdown over stand your ground laws with Trayvon Martin, when the defense of Zimmerman was based on self defense, not the stand your ground laws.

We have had an ongoing national conversation over stand your ground, triggered by the Trayvon Martin case, when that case had nothing to do with stand your ground in the first place.

How is it that liberals were able to use this case to talk about stand your ground laws when the case had nothing to do with stand your ground laws?????

[rktman]

I’m guessin’ that al not so sharpton figured that SYG is racis’ and he could make some money off of it. SYG is firmly in place to be vilified and condemned as a way to let whitey off for popping black folks. Or some liblogic as that.

[CodeToad]

Trayvon didn’t run as these people demand Z should have. Why didn’t T just run into his dad’s house instead of chasing down and attacking Z?

T’s supporters are idiots since they don’t see that.

[TXnMA]

"I still don’t understand, and may never understand, how it is that the liberals had a meltdown over stand your ground laws..."

~~~~~~~

It's simple: the REAL black (and liberal) agenda was to use Zim as an excuse to negate both SYG & SD laws -- so that "repressed" blacks would be free to extend their "right" to "play" their "Whack-a Honky Reparations 'Game'" -- to anyone, any time, any place -- with no legal repercussions.

And, their next agenda step is to extend that to "Kill-a-Honky..." -- again, without legal repercussions...

Both have already happened -- repeatedly -- and the MSM says the reports are "a myth"...

[mlo]

"How is it that liberals were able to use this case to talk about stand your ground laws when the case had nothing to do with stand your ground laws?????"

That's the thing. They didn't talk about SYG laws. They talked about their fantasy version of SYG laws, which were totally disconnected from what they really are. Hence the topic of this post.