Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Attention Surplus Disorder

Since when does photographing the wife of a public figure require authorization?

Can celebs now sue paparazzi for taking unauthorized photos of them?

/stealth-political-class-privilege call-out.


35 posted on 06/27/2014 8:54:10 AM PDT by Justa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Justa

A resident’s room in a nursing home is not a public place.


39 posted on 06/27/2014 8:58:12 AM PDT by drjimmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: Justa

In a private facility....It’s very untoward. Probably not illegal, but seriously lacking any sort of discretion and not even minimally thought out.


45 posted on 06/27/2014 9:00:32 AM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (At no time was the Obama administration aware of what the Obama administration was doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: Justa

>> Since when does photographing the wife of a public figure require authorization? <<

When she’s in a nursing home, totally unaware of her surroundings and basically in a vegetative state.

In addition, Mississippi law makes it a felony to “exploit” anybody defined as a “vulnerable” adult.


110 posted on 06/27/2014 1:12:21 PM PDT by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: Justa

This guy was being charged with conspiracy - to do what criminal act?

Like you say, why haven’t the paparazzi been charged with anything?

The guy who allegedly shot himself did the great crime of telling where Cochran’s wife’s room was; he knew because his mother used to live the same place.

Yes, this plan was stupid and hurtful, but what is the crime? Conspiracy to do what crime?


142 posted on 06/28/2014 9:29:19 PM PDT by butterdezillion (Note to self : put this between arrow keys: img src=""/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: Justa
Note that all three defendants were charged only with "conspiracy" but nothing in the way of an actual crime that the conspiracy was planning on committing. "Conspiracy" is a so-called inchoate crime and REQUIRES an underlying criminal charge which is not conspiracy. If you agree with three friends to play bridge or go to a movie this Friday night, you may be said to be conspiring but you have committed no crime and haven't even discussed committing one.

Then there were the $200,000 bonds for each one charged with this bogus charge. WHAT???? I thought that a very good part of the civil rights movement of the 1950s and 1960s was to demonstrate that the constitution applies even in MISSISSIPPI. Did they suspect the lawyer to flee the jurisdiction, abandon his practice, his wife, his children, his home, his apparently upstanding reputation in the community? Or, if he really HAD to be arrested, why was he not released on a promise to appear? Because Haley Boss Hogg Barbour said so? Or Thad Cockroach?

REMEMBER MISSISSIPPI now and forever.

150 posted on 07/01/2014 3:44:08 PM PDT by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline, Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Society: Rack 'em Danno!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson