And BTW, if/when it comes out that Obama is not eligible to be POTUS but was put into office through crimes perpetrated by the enemies of the USA, he would have to be classified as an enemy combatant. The rationale used to kill US citizens would mean, then, that it wouldn’t even MATTER if he naturalized as a US citizen because citizenship NOW doesn’t matter; citizens have no more protections than non-citizens.
So a secret military drone strike on him would be appropriate, BY HIS OWN MEASURE.
Hoist on his own petard.
Just to clarify: my posts on this thread are from a hypothetical standpoint, carrying Obama’s arguments to their natural conclusions. If what I am saying is considered dangerous by the powers-that-be, then OBAMA IS THE DANGEROUS ONE because he’s the one saying this stuff.
All I’m saying is turnabout’s fair play. Those who live by the sword can very easily die by that same sword. You can only ride the military tiger for so long before it turns over and you’re the one on the bottom. You have pissed off WAY too many military people, Obama the foreign enemy combatant, and a lot of people are seeing you for who you really are. The authorizations and rulings you have forced people to make..... may seal your own fate. Your own decrees will condemn you.
And I might add, a drone strike to an enemy combatant is done extra-judicially. There doesn’t have to be a court ruling that the person is an enemy combatant, doesn’t have to be a finding or decision. Combat orders are in the discretion of some LtCol out there, according to Denise Lind, and when the order is given it MUST be obeyed unless it calls for criminal action. And Obama has said that it is NOT criminal for the US military to kill even a US citizen that THEY CALL an enemy combatant - no evidence or court ruling necessary. It wouldn’t be murder for a LtCol to make the combat order and it wouldn’t be criminal for the order to be obeyed, according to Obama’s own arguments.