Notice it says "former" exec. This means that the MAIGgots can nullify whatever he says based on his being a "disgruntled" former employee. Simple as that.
1 posted on
06/17/2014 5:58:13 AM PDT by
rktman
To: rktman
Before the gun was invented people did mass killings with FIRE.
Those sick souls hell bent on killing always found a way, didn't they?
To: rktman
However, “sensible” and “common sense” legislation on “a woman’s right to choose” could prevent the murders of millions of American children each year. Then, Barry and the ‘RATS wouldn’t have to bus “children” in from Guatemala.
3 posted on
06/17/2014 6:02:57 AM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
(Obama's smidgens are coming home to roost.)
To: rktman
It’s not about guns or shootings or murder or mayhem; it never has been. It’s about control.
4 posted on
06/17/2014 6:06:04 AM PDT by
muir_redwoods
(When I first read it, " Atlas Shrugged" was fiction)
To: rktman
Try this on for size:
What if Bloomberg said "drunk driving by underage teens are killing too many children, so we need common sense reforms to more highly regulate bars and taverns."?
Same difference.
5 posted on
06/17/2014 6:09:12 AM PDT by
Yo-Yo
(Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
To: rktman
Bloomberg's Top Advocate Admits Gun Control Proposals Wouldn't Stop Mass Shootings Yes, but gun control was never and is never about stopping crime. It's about disarming and rendering defenseless the citizenry, so that a tyrannical police state can be imposed without risk to the tyrans or their JBTs.
8 posted on
06/17/2014 6:24:55 AM PDT by
from occupied ga
(Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
To: rktman
They know their proposals don’t do far enough. Watch: next they’ll be talking confiscation. Obama already is (praising Australia). The Abramski ruling yesterday can be used as a tool in the next step toward that.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson