Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Boeing’s commercial CST-100 ‘Space Taxi’ will carry a crew of five astronauts to low Earth orbit and the ISS from US soil. Mockup with astronaut mannequins seated below pilot console and Samsung tablets was unveiled on June 9, 2014 at its planned manufacturing facility at the Kennedy Space Center in Florida. Credit: Ken Kremer

Hatch opening to Boeing’s commercial CST-100 crew transporter. Credit: Ken Kremer

Boeing unveiled full scale mockup of their commercial CST-100 ‘Space Taxi’ on June 9, 2014 at its intended manufacturing facility at the Kennedy Space Center in Florida. The private vehicle will launch US astronauts to low Earth orbit and the ISS from US soil. Credit: Ken Kremer


1 posted on 06/13/2014 2:00:06 PM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Red Badger

It’s just like the Apollo era command module. Isn’t this a step backwards?

CC


2 posted on 06/13/2014 2:08:13 PM PDT by Celtic Conservative (tease not the dragon for thou art crunchy when roasted and taste good with ketchup)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Using this regression of space travel as an example, if the government were in charge of development of flight we should be changing back to propeller driven planes by now.


6 posted on 06/13/2014 2:17:55 PM PDT by Rebelbase (Tagline: optional, printed after your name on post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Here's the Orion Module.

Yeah, it's the same shape as the Boeing and the Apollo, but it really does have capabilities quite in advance of the Apollo.

10 posted on 06/13/2014 2:33:41 PM PDT by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Seven person MAX capacity?

What will OSHA say if they have to use this to rescue 8 persons at the ISS?


13 posted on 06/13/2014 2:53:00 PM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Alteration: The acronym explains the science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

1. This is a model, not real hardware, and 2. Spacex looks well ahead of this.


14 posted on 06/13/2014 2:55:19 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Hmmm...tablets. I wonder if they can watch Netflix while enroute?


16 posted on 06/13/2014 3:23:49 PM PDT by Sergio (An object at rest cannot be stopped! - The Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

What if Putin won’t allow anymore of us back on the space station?


17 posted on 06/13/2014 5:07:17 PM PDT by Dixie Yooper (Ephesians 6:11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
BFD!

It looks like Boeing's approach is to "go on the cheap" by sacrificing crew comfort and safety during acceleration -- in a second-hand Apollo Command module -- with toy avionics...

No wonder they used mannikins: no human could stay in those padless torture racks long enough to make the photos -- @ one gee!

Has any engineer here ever seen such an outlandish "******-rig"?

18 posted on 06/13/2014 5:10:01 PM PDT by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias... "Barack": Allah's current ally...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson