[Republican Wildcat]

First of all, it isn’t a gay “marriage” ban - you can’t ban something that does not and cannot exist. It simply affirms language - the definition of marriage - and no gay “marriages” were taking place prior to this law, either, because two men or two women “marrying” each other does not fit the definition of marriage. Two men cannot be husband and wife, nor can two women. Language is not unconstitutional - it is simply reality.

[rollo tomasi]

But stare decisis has a loooonnnggggg tradition in the United States that has established/decided two men being husband and wife as well as two women exists, lol, and get this, through Equal Protection.

Just ask the legal “Constitutionalists” explaining this looonnngggg traditional definition, especially when avoiding Pandora's Jar being cracked open when the absurdity is brought to light.