If he is so worried about children being “murdered” he might want to start at the Abortion factories who have a record of over 55,000,000 murdered since 1973. I doubt there is even 1/100th of that number murdered by guns in the same time frame.
But of course it's more then merely the emotional tugs pulling at liberals' heartstrings when they see a school massacre on television, there is a blindness in liberals to the appalling death count in abortion. At the risk of being accused of Semitic bigotry, there is a history among Jewish liberals which aggressively favors abortion. I think, but of course I do not know, because it is believed to somehow facilitate the emancipation of women which is closely defendant upon the sexual emancipation of women.
So we see the Ruth Bader Ginsburgs of this world distorting the Constitution to justify 55 million baby death while she becomes a Talmudic Rabbi and finds all manner of hidden meanings to the right of privacy which justify abortion. Worse, she has explicitly tied it to the sexual and social emancipation of women and explicitly justified abortion on those grounds. In doing this she comes from a long line of Jewish liberals.
Does David letterman react the way he does against a few babies killed in a school massacre while remaining blind to tens of millions aborted because of his cultural heritage?
Is it legitimate even to ask?