Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DISTRACTING US WITH GI(HAD) JOE
Original Content | June 2, 2014 | By Laz A. Mataz

Posted on 06/02/2014 10:01:40 AM PDT by Lazamataz

This weekend, Obama swapped five dangerous Taliban commanders for one questionable American soldier.

The five Taliban commanders are: Mullah Mohammad Fazl (Taliban army chief of staff), Mullah Norullah Noori (senior Taliban military commander), Abdul Haq Wasiq (Taliban deputy minister of intelligence), Khairullah Khairkhwa (Taliban governor of the Herat province and former interior minister), and Mohammed Nabi (senior Taliban figure and security official).

In return, we got one America soldier who, his peers write, abandoned his post to join the Taliban, and who's Islamic-beard-adorned father has worked tirelessly to release more terrorists.

Immediately after this, we have Hagel and Rice 'gaslighting' us with absurd statements, Hagel claiming we did not negotiate with terrorists, when negotiating with terrorists to secure the soldiers release, and Rice claiming that a soldier who deserted his post to join the enemy served the United States with honor and distinction.

It appears that the Islamic-supporting Obama administration gets a three-fer on this one. They get to release five of America's most dangerous enemies; free a radicalized American soldier; and distract from the looming scandals of Benghazi and the Veterans Administration veteran deaths. The Obama administration also gets people talking about this, rather than the new, radical EPA anti-constitutional 'Carbon Cap and Trade' scheme.

This appears to be the modus operandi of the Obama administration: Commit as many scandals as possible, to overwhelm the public and keep a constantly-shifting target. One cannot properly investigate one act of outright treason with this group, because they commit five more acts of treason before nightfall, and freely publicize them so that you are too outraged about those acts, to pursue the original one. We cannot allow Obama to distract us from other scandals by waving around his GI(had) Joe doll.

This is the Cloward-Piven strategy, of overwhelming the system -- but instead of applying Cloward-Piven to the economic state of the country, Obama is applying it to the legal system and enjoying acts of treason.

What is the solution to this Cloward-Piven treason-overload? Pick the very worst act of treason, and pursue it until prosecution is complete. When in front of the press, speak to no other issue. Do not answer the press's questions on the topic at hand, but direct them back to your investigation of treason.


TOPICS: FReeper Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; bergdahl; bobbergdahl; bowebergdahl; clowardpiven; gitmo; prisoners
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last
To: TADSLOS
Spot on analysis. Anyone currently talking about Benghazi? The VA scandal? The IRS scandal? I’m willing to bet that The Lizard Queen in the White Hut has a contingency planning cell of flying monkeys ready to drop these tail wag and running squirrel scenarios everytime Obama’s optics start to smell badly. They have diversion down to an art form.

It's diversion to a point; but diversion is presumably about distracting from one thing, or a small several things, to other things.

It's not that diversion is the true and ultimate goal; it is, however, a welcome side effect.

No, it is much more that Obama simply wishes to tear down this system, and what better way than to employ Cloward-Piven on the political and scandal system?

61 posted on 06/02/2014 5:02:07 PM PDT by Lazamataz (Early 2009 to 7/21/2013 - RIP my little girl Cathy. You were the best cat ever. You will be missed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
I wonder who hates this country more, Obama, Jane Fonda or Grand Ayatollah Khamenei... .


62 posted on 06/02/2014 5:04:37 PM PDT by darkwing104 (Forgive but don't forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: darkwing104

Obama. Hands down.


63 posted on 06/02/2014 5:05:12 PM PDT by Lazamataz (Early 2009 to 7/21/2013 - RIP my little girl Cathy. You were the best cat ever. You will be missed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Yes, I agree. Obama and his crew have been flooding the zone from day one. Today’s distraction is tomorrow’s scandal as another distraction is forming to blunt it....ad nauseum. So far, it’s working. Any other President would have been facing impeachment proceedings by now.


64 posted on 06/02/2014 5:12:02 PM PDT by TADSLOS (The Event Horizon has come and gone. Buckle up and hang on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Orangedog
All eat up with the cynicism bug, huh?

Must be hell...

65 posted on 06/02/2014 5:15:38 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: Ignorance on parade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Certainly you’re not surprised by that.


66 posted on 06/02/2014 5:36:36 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Tanks for the Bumpo

My pleasure, Laz. A great FReeper/thinker (with a great sense of humor). Thanks for all that you do. Top a great analysis off with a solution and it is very BUMPWORTHY!

(besides, I'm a satisfied customer)

67 posted on 06/02/2014 6:46:20 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
The Obama administration also gets people talking about this, rather than the new, radical EPA anti-constitutional 'Carbon Cap and Trade' scheme.

The subject will be changed when the first major blackout hits due to lack of backup capacity.

68 posted on 06/02/2014 7:18:27 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Of COURSE bacon is good for you!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: okie01

The naive call it cynicism. The rest of us just call it paying attention.


69 posted on 06/02/2014 7:20:57 PM PDT by Orangedog (An optimist is someone who tells you to 'cheer up' when things are going his way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz; 3D-JOY; abner; Abundy; AGreatPer; Albion Wilde; AliVeritas; alisasny; ...
Pick the very worst act of treason, and pursue it until prosecution is complete.

But . . . there are so many . . . it's hard to determine the worst. Maybe rank them on a scale of 1 to 300?

PING!

70 posted on 06/02/2014 7:22:34 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Of COURSE bacon is good for you!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Bump from your 242nd satisfied customer! You’re right about the strategy. Everything this regime does gives Alinsky tingles and goose bumps.


71 posted on 06/02/2014 7:28:49 PM PDT by azishot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
What makes it really scary is that there seems to be no one in DC up to holding them to any laws. Holder's a joke and is acting like Obama’s personal consigliere and defense attorney.
72 posted on 06/02/2014 7:43:08 PM PDT by Bullish (You ever notice that liberalism really just amounts to anti-morality?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

What happens when they demand the Blind Sheikh?


73 posted on 06/02/2014 8:21:28 PM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Laz- What’s the worst act of treason we should focus on?? There are too many to consider.....


74 posted on 06/02/2014 8:44:24 PM PDT by Reddy (bo stinks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Orangedog

The bent-one was impeached for lying under oath... saying that he was impeached for lying about a blow job only helps entrench the shrugging lowfo voter lies as they parrot “it was only about sex”....


75 posted on 06/02/2014 8:48:44 PM PDT by Reddy (bo stinks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

You are right. There was a liberal tonight on Facebook vilifying Nixon (still) and championing zero. And it was beyond reason.


76 posted on 06/02/2014 8:51:32 PM PDT by Reddy (bo stinks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Buuump! And thanks, sweet Laz!


77 posted on 06/02/2014 9:46:03 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Reddy

We both know Nixon had his faults. Conservatives sometimes capitalize on them to buttress the idea he was a bad guy. Compared to what we have today, the man was a saint.

He did what he thought was right for this nation. I have absolutely not doubt about that. Was he always right? No. I have some big problems with his agenda.

My bottom line is this. He didn’t hate the United States. He may have been clueless on some matters, but when push came to shove, the guy would have done everything possible to protect us against the terrorist hoards.

This jackass today, and the other dope from Hope, would have sold this nation out for a dime.

That story won’t get told. It’s a damned shame. So when I see our side trash Nixon, I realize I’m probably talking to someone either ten years old or with the strategic grasp of a ten year old.


78 posted on 06/02/2014 11:35:47 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Reddy

Yes, he lied under oath....about a blowjob. It’s a throw-away charge used by prosecutors to either force a plea deal or cover up the bungling of a case. It was the weakest, pussy charge that could have possibly been made considering the string of criminal activity of his administration. You know, the trivial, hard to prove stuff like murder, corruption selling national secrets to foreign goverments. Ken star and the committee that drafted those articles are all a bunch of feckless cowards who did this country one of the greatest disservices ever by destroying the credibility of any future impeachment proceedings to the point that it may never be used again.


79 posted on 06/03/2014 4:19:12 AM PDT by Orangedog (An optimist is someone who tells you to 'cheer up' when things are going his way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Orangedog

I don’t care if it’s about a kiss on the cheek. You seem to dismiss lying under oath as trivial. I’m glad those who voted for impeachment didn’t feel that way.


80 posted on 06/03/2014 8:45:52 AM PDT by Reddy (bo stinks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson