[sickoflibs]

RE:”Why do most policies demand transparency between sexual partners in regard to their H.I.V.-status, but not in regard to past behaviors that may have caused a yet undetected H.I.V. infection, such as intravenous drug use or unprotected sex with partners who do not regularly get tested for sexually transmitted diseases? “

Does this question make any sense to anyone else? It doesn't to me.

The laws should also cover other similarly transmitted diseases.

[SampleMan]

Reckless endangerment law always applies.

The HIV specific laws were passed because it was a specific problem that kept coming up. Just as you might see a specific law against damaging a parking meter, but not a specific law about every other piece of city property.

[Freeping Since 2001]

The law should at least cover all potentially-fatal STDs.