Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sherman Logan; sevinufnine
According to the British Nationality Act of 1948 Barack was born to a British subject and therefore became a British subject at birth. Don't take my word for it you can read right from the Obama campaign website!
“When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children. Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. citizenship nor sworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired on Aug. 4,1982.”
Sneaky....The Kenyan constitution does state that if you do not denounce your other citizenship and swear an oath to Kenya then your citizenship does in fact expire. But they give you a two year grace period so the date Aug 4, 1982 should read Aug 4, 1984. Big deal Greg...Well it is. Enter the British Nationality Act of 1981.

Every person who—
(a)under [F105the British Nationality Acts 1981 and 1983][F106or the British Overseas Territories Act 2002] is a British citizen, a [F107British overseas territories citizen] , [F108a British National (Overseas),] a British Overseas citizen or a British subject; or
(b)under any enactment for the time being in force in any country mentioned in Schedule 3 is a citizen of that country, shall have the status of a Commonwealth citizen.

The UK was terminating the title of "subject" and replacing it with "Commonwealth Citizen" in this act. So the date above is relevant because the commencement date of the BNA 1981 was Jan 1, 1983 while Obama was still considered a Kenyan Citizen thus being a British Subject then became a "Commonwealth Citizen" of the UK. We have a Brit in the WH!

70 posted on 05/28/2014 9:07:42 AM PDT by GregNH (If you can't fight, please find a good place to hide!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: GregNH

Interesting, if true and applicable to Obama, but utterly irrelevant to his status as an American citizen.

We do not base our judgment of whether a person is or is not an American citizen on acts of other countries. Only American law is considered, as it should be.

The whole issue is, to me, tiresome and again utterly irrelevant. When we have literally tens of millions of impeccably natural-born US citizens who hate and despise their own country, what is the point of getting upset about whether a particular politician is or is not technically a natural-born citizen? Is there any particular reason for us to believe Obama’s attitudes to this country would be different if his father had been from Ohio? I don’t think so.


73 posted on 05/28/2014 9:19:45 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson