Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cowboy Bob
The parents must have talked to lawyers, and this is was they are saying in an attempt to avoid lawsuits.

Wasn't the shooter over 18? Why would his parents be concerned about lawsuits? They're not legally responsible for him anymore.

If they were legally responsible for him, it appears they clearly would've kept him in mental health care.

I just don't see how they're liable once he's passed 18 and he was allowed by the state (again, no one stopped him) to discontinue treatment.

Granted, the parents are failure by themselves -- this however sounds more like a failure of the State's mental health resources to properly identify him as an 'at risk' individual.

80 posted on 05/26/2014 7:06:27 AM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: usconservative

I’d say if they knew he was nuts and funded the gun purchases then yes they are liable.


90 posted on 05/26/2014 7:23:36 AM PDT by Undecided 2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson