Will Conyers ruling be appealed? (Judge's ruling violated Michigan law)

The Hill ^ | 5-24-2014 | Mario Trujillo

[DH]

The corruption of our legal system is now complete.

There are laws for you and laws for “them.”

[KarenMarie]

When one of the Perot supporters complained, one judge reminded him that if you want to be in the big leagues, follow the rules. LOL!!!!

Unless you're name is Torrecelli or Lautenberg. :)

[DaveA37]

There is no way Conyers should be on that ballot. IMO, the JUDGE needs to be prosecuted for making such a decision. Crazy!

[smoothsailing]

Rebublican Congressman Thad McCotter in 2012

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2012/05/29/rep-mccotter-runs-for-re-election-as-a-write-in/

[Revel]

Too Big to Break the law.

[cpdiii]

The judge noted that he hurried to file the injunction Friday to give all parties time to appeal, if necessary, to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals before the June 6 deadline to certify the ballot.

Bull Sh--! The judge could have just as easily upheld the rule of law and ruled quickly against Conyers This would have given Conyers ample time to appeal. The judge is a liar.

[Mr. K]

The SOS should just say that the judge wants her to disobey the law and she won’t do it, and call for the judge’s impeachment

[holden]

As the judge said, because of Conyers' likelihood of success (by hook, crook, ballot-box stuffing, Democrats amok in the district), the state needs to find a less restrictive means to enforce its law than doing the obvious: keeping Conyers off the ballot, says Obama's appointee. Conyers is deemed too important to follow the law. If he can't follow the law, the law needs to be broken to let him win nonetheless, despite his contra-legal ways. It's Lautenberg all over again.

The judge needs to be impeached for not faithfully executing the law.

HF

[Gritty]

Conyers probably would win a write-in vote... except most of his constituents don’t know how to write. They only knows the buttons the Massa tells them to push (the ones with the “D” next to them).