Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mojito

If “Downsizing the terror war” meant reducing or eliminating the surveillance state, I would argue that the risk would be more than worth it.


2 posted on 05/22/2014 10:17:35 AM PDT by Jack of all Trades (Hold your face to the light, even though for the moment you do not see.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Jack of all Trades
The purpose of the surveillance state is not to compromise or defeat islamist terrorists, so there is no chance in he!! that Barry is getting rid of the NSA.
3 posted on 05/22/2014 10:19:33 AM PDT by mojito (Zero, our Nero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Jack of all Trades
If “Downsizing the terror war” meant reducing or eliminating the surveillance state, I would argue that the risk would be more than worth it.

Agree. Zero's regime has shown total incompetence in actually fighting terrorism (can anyone spell Benghazi?), so who's all that surveillance for? Why it's for us conservative non-worshipers of government of course.

5 posted on 05/22/2014 10:21:08 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson