The “peer-reviewed” journals have been rejecting papers that question AGW/Climate-change for decades. The entire peer-review process has become a joke.
I have news for you. It’s not just AGW/climate change with the problem. It’s endemic.
Peer review == pal review.
I guess it depends on whose peers are doing the reviewing.
Unfortunately, the current bunch in climate science should be reviewing sixth grade political position statements, not scientific papers.