Ping for later.
Having read all this, and needing a second cup of coffee, (it’s still early morning for me), I have questions:
Was this intended to be an essay? A commentary? A denouncement? It seems to me, to be circumspecular.
What is the point?
To WHOM PRECISELY, if you, the author, were intending so, to be the audience?
I’ve read Mdme. Blavetsky’s (not her real name), tomes. YAWN!
I’ve read the Buddhist sutra- Christian Psalms compilation and comparison. ‘How d’ey do d’at?’
Kabbalah? I’m not Jewish, so I don’t touch it.
One of the oldest books in existence, The Bhaghavad Gita, is an interesting read. But so are Dashiell Hammett, Mickey Spillane and Rex Stout.
“The attack on biblical creation in UK schools continues,”
A small fraction of the world’s Christians believe in the literal interpretation of Genesis. So an “attack” on creationism is not the same thing as an attack on Christianity.
I got as far as the part where you complain about the “vicious name-calling” and “demonization” of creationists, and then immediately claim evolutionists want to crucify Christ and worship demons. The irony got too thick at that point. (Hint: think about the root of the word “demonize.”)