[thorvaldr]

Remember when everyone gathered around this guy based on his sophisticated and erudite take on public policy and race relations? No, neither do I. Folks mostly objected to the “1st amendment zone” and wanted the BLM to not shoot him in the head and take his cattle. His opinions don’t really impact whether the BLM should shoot him and take his cattle in order for Harry Reid to make more money.

[ponygirl]

This is the part where they must “Cut off the support network and isolate, polarize, demonize.” Because Bundy said something with a politically incorrect word, it's now okay if his family is massacred and his land stolen so Harry Reid can sell it to the Chinese for solar panels.

None of this has any bearing on what we all witnessed last week where an out of control, militarized federal government brought their storm troopers to “protect” a freaking turtle and steal an old man’s cows.

[apillar]

His opinions don’t really impact whether the BLM should shoot him and take his cattle in order for Harry Reid to make more money.

I don't know, by reading some of the comments on other sites (some even by so-called Republicans), it appears that there are now a significant number that would have no problem with government shooting him in the head and taking his land solely for making the comments. I guess free speech is only allowed when its politically correct...

[Psalm 144]

Absolutely. This is about paramilitary abuse, not Cliven Bundy’s legal or social scholarship.