Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Amendment10
So regardless of her approach to having the states initiate a Con-Con, I’m curious as to why Sarah isn’t trying to work both options of the Constitution’s Article V for proposing an amendment to the Constitution to the states.

In the first place, no one is proposing a call for a "con-con"... see Post 2... and also see the Constitution. Nowhere does it provide for another Constitutional Convention. As a matter of fact, language that would have allowed for another constitutional convention was refused four times by the Founders before they settled on the 143 words that now comprise Article V.

And in the second place, how do you know that she isn't?

20 posted on 04/24/2014 2:10:25 PM PDT by Strawberry AZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Strawberry AZ; All
And in the second place, how do you know that she isn't?

She may be, but not publicly. And that's disturbing at this time because she really needs to get the word out before the 2014 elections.

21 posted on 04/24/2014 2:14:59 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson