Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lurking Libertarian

Dear Stupid People in Robes; how about you let a jury decide?
I’m pretty sure that 12 names pulled randomly from a hat can do a better job than you nine.


15 posted on 04/23/2014 10:45:18 AM PDT by Valpal1 (If the police can t solve a problem with violence, they ll find a way to fix it with brute force)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Valpal1
Dear Stupid People in Robes; how about you let a jury decide? I’m pretty sure that 12 names pulled randomly from a hat can do a better job than you nine.

That's not the law Congress wrote. The statute says that the jury decides if the defendant is guilty of possession of child porn, and the judge decides his sentence, including the amount of restitution.

20 posted on 04/23/2014 10:56:11 AM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Valpal1

The problem with this is she can’t drag some 70,000 viewers into court
to sue them the perpetrator has no money!!!! I wonder though if she could
sue the porn site for carrying the photos!!!!


32 posted on 04/23/2014 12:02:34 PM PDT by Kit cat (OBummer must go)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson