Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Price of Gas in U.S. Rises as Refiners Export More to Other Countries
WSJ ^ | 21 April 2014 | Nicole Friedman

Posted on 04/22/2014 12:36:23 PM PDT by Theoria

Drivers in the U.S. are facing rising gasoline prices ahead of summer-vacation season, just as refiners here are shipping more gas to other countries.

A new pipeline, built to release a glut of crude oil that was stuck in the middle of the country, is now feeding oil to refineries on the Gulf Coast that churn out gasoline and diesel. While these fuels still make their way to the Southeast and the East Coast, growing amounts are being sold to Mexico, the Netherlands, Brazil and other countries.

The push into these markets has been spurred by the U.S. oil boom. Rising oil output had been flooding the nation's oil market in recent years, keeping U.S. crude prices low relative to world prices. Facing tepid fuel demand in the U.S., refiners have been ramping up exports, creating more global competition for U.S.-produced fuel.

While the construction of pipelines and other transportation infrastructure allows other countries to benefit from the oil boom, it also means the market for motor fuels has become more competitive. The gasoline market now has to reckon with demand from other countries—and the potential impact on prices—during a U.S. economic recovery many economists see as fragile.

"Quite frankly, this is not just a U.S.-centric topic anymore," said Nancy White, a spokeswoman for motor club AAA. "Production is going overseas, so that impacts the supply here, and that will drive prices up."

Gasoline stockpiles nationwide are at their lowest point for this time of year since 2011, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. Meantime, the retail price for a gallon of regular gasoline averaged $3.68 on Monday, up 4.2% from a year ago, according to the EIA. That is the highest price since March 2013. AAA had the average price on Monday at $3.67.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: economy; exports; federalland; federallandmap; gas; gasoline; gasolineexports; pipeline
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121 next last
To: FreedomNotSafety

Ya think these people wouldn’t support and sell to America’s enemies for a profit? Ya think they’ve never done so?

Why are you evading the question?


81 posted on 04/22/2014 4:50:33 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: BfloGuy
Ya think these people wouldn’t support and sell to America’s enemies for a profit? Ya think they’ve never done so?

Oh, get over your Marxism and get a grip.

LOL...Feel free to answer the question slick.

82 posted on 04/22/2014 4:51:45 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: familyop

Looks we nay disagree some on Russia but we think alike on this.


83 posted on 04/22/2014 4:52:57 PM PDT by FreedomNotSafety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

allegiance? Sorry, but the value of the dollar not allegiance is the reason for what you pay at the pump.


84 posted on 04/22/2014 4:55:33 PM PDT by TBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gen.Blather

Gen. you forgot to mention that officers of public companies are required to maximize return to their shareholders. Being out of a job might be the least of their concerns if they fail to do so.


85 posted on 04/22/2014 4:56:10 PM PDT by Former Proud Canadian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TBall

Keep reading. Clearly it’s over profits, this is no secret.

Profits regardless of consequences...No?


86 posted on 04/22/2014 4:57:06 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

I will answer your question as soon as you tell me who these enemies are.

But I am in favor of selling to our enemies at a profit since it beat the shiite of selling to them at a loss.


87 posted on 04/22/2014 4:57:16 PM PDT by FreedomNotSafety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: FreedomNotSafety
Ya think these people wouldn’t support and sell to America’s enemies for a profit? Ya think they’ve never done so?

I am in favor of selling to our enemies at a profit since it beat the shiite of selling to them at a loss.

Oh yeah....So there ya have it...

Those making the big profits benefit, all other Americans can eat sh*t.

Wow..

88 posted on 04/22/2014 5:01:14 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: familyop
Sure, there are plenty of goofy comments. But, this nation was founded on tariffs. I wouldn't consider a tariff ‘un-conservative’. It might not meet today's litmus test for a conservatives in free market theory. But, it does have a long history of use in our country. Nor would I suggest we use them. But, by in large our trade policies today lack trade reciprocity.
89 posted on 04/22/2014 5:08:24 PM PDT by Theoria (End Socialism : No more GOP and Dem candidates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: FreedomNotSafety

Agreed.


90 posted on 04/22/2014 5:15:54 PM PDT by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

I am still waiting for that enemies list and your answer as to whether or not you support a 100% ban on trading with them. Or is this theoretical exercise?


91 posted on 04/22/2014 5:16:13 PM PDT by FreedomNotSafety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

So how much profit are you o’k with? Since you don’t like big profits maybe you like small profits or losses better?


92 posted on 04/22/2014 5:19:05 PM PDT by FreedomNotSafety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

The tariffs you are talking about were levied on imports, not exports. There is a huge difference.


93 posted on 04/22/2014 5:22:39 PM PDT by Former Proud Canadian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: FreedomNotSafety
Or, maybe the government should open a Department of Profits. Only a few problems with that, for starters, should we base allowable profit as a percentage of assets or as a percentage of sales? What is a "fair" profit? 5%? 25%? Who is to decide?

A better question might be, who in their right mind would invest in an economy where your profits are capped by law?

94 posted on 04/22/2014 5:27:17 PM PDT by Former Proud Canadian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

I agree on imports but not exports. The purpose of the effort behind the Tariff Act was focused on foreign imports. Southerners disagreed, because they wanted to continue buying non-agricultural products from elsewhere instead of buying them from northern manufacturers.


95 posted on 04/22/2014 5:27:39 PM PDT by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

Why isn’t bill o’reilly complaining about and investigating the rise of gas prices like he did under Bush’s administration!


96 posted on 04/22/2014 5:28:17 PM PDT by ncpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

A tariff is a tax. A sales tax. As in any tax it is only paid by the customer. So if you favor higher prices then implement another tax. All a tariff does is let politicians dole out exemptions for their donors.

Some on this forum have a list of items that should have tariffs and a list of items that should not. In years of asking these questions no one has answered it. Who decides what gets a tariff, what does not, and how high the tariff should be? Would you let the 0 administration do it or should wait until a Republican is president?

What is the criteria for imposing a a tariff and who decides what that criteria is? Should food be exempted? Or just food we do not grow here? What if only one company grows it do they get a monopoly. If they have a monopoly then should the government regulate their prices?


97 posted on 04/22/2014 5:29:34 PM PDT by FreedomNotSafety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: familyop

Wasn’t there some tea tossed about over a tariff?


98 posted on 04/22/2014 5:31:34 PM PDT by FreedomNotSafety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Former Proud Canadian

Sadly there are some on this forum who think profits should be capped since they mistakenly believe they will get cheaper prices. To their credit they get real squeamish when asked to define how much profit is too much and WHO gets to decide what that level is.


99 posted on 04/22/2014 5:34:54 PM PDT by FreedomNotSafety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

“Ya think these people wouldn’t support and sell to American’s enemies for a profit?”

If they do business with enemies, then they should be fined by the Feds.


100 posted on 04/22/2014 5:35:23 PM PDT by Oliviaforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson