Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ben Ficklin

Well, I believe the states (or most of them) and certainly the people now want their land and natural resources. The 1976 act is unconstitutional. Period.

Why are you defending BIG government tyranny on FR? I think that would better be done on moveon.org.


60 posted on 04/22/2014 1:46:37 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: Jim Robinson
"Why are you defending BIG government"

I'm not defending anybody, I'm merely pointing out that there is history as to how things became as they are and you can't go back and change history.

Similarly, there is a history as to how the sub-merged lands on our coast came to be owned by who. The federal govt owns most of that. But the constitution doesn't say anything about that.

So, in reality, when the states entered the union, each state would negotiate a settlement with the feds about who owned what land.

In 1954, Eisenhower negotiated an agreement with the coastal states as to what part of the continental shelf belonged to the feds and what part belonged to the states. But before that, Truman issued a proclamation claiming the entire continental shelf for the feds(1945), and SCOTUS upheld him.

64 posted on 04/22/2014 2:02:33 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson