Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Seruzawa

The fact is, poor people sucking on the government teat are also sucking on cigarettes. Clearly they have disposable income to spend on cigarettes....the rhetorical question is why aren’t they putting those dollars to use on housing?


4 posted on 04/22/2014 9:10:45 AM PDT by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Drango

You sound like a lib smoke Nazi.


5 posted on 04/22/2014 9:19:19 AM PDT by ifinnegan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Drango

“The fact is, poor people sucking on the government teat are also sucking on cigarettes. Clearly they have disposable income to spend on cigarettes...the rhetorical question is why aren’t they putting those dollars to use on housing?”

That he is fine with the government micromanaging how one spends their money.

If not smokes, then maybe mandated vitamins, or fruits and veggies, no meat, no sugar, no cigs, no beer.

He’s Bloomberg.


15 posted on 04/22/2014 9:39:02 AM PDT by ifinnegan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Drango

she probably smokes 2-5 cigs a day. theyre something like 25 cents each in Ohio

drop in the bucket compared to housing costs


28 posted on 04/22/2014 10:37:36 AM PDT by varyouga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson