Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hinckley buzzard

Most people, including conservatives, still believe it was okay for “federal agents” to use military equipment against civilians. As far as I’m concerned, a federal agent IS the military. There were no letter agencies when the constitution was being written.


72 posted on 04/21/2014 8:48:46 PM PDT by VerySadAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: VerySadAmerican

“Most people, including conservatives, still believe it was okay for “federal agents” to use military equipment against civilians.”

Huh? Conservatives?


87 posted on 04/21/2014 9:39:13 PM PDT by SgtHooper (I lost my tag!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

To: VerySadAmerican
Most people, including conservatives, still believe it was okay for “federal agents” to use military equipment against civilians. As far as I’m concerned, a federal agent IS the military. There were no letter agencies when the constitution was being written.

There were no "letter agencies" when the Posse Comitatus Act was originally written. Under the "if it walks like a duck" principle, if a federal agent is carrying military-type weapons and gear, and has had military-type training, then he is military.

122 posted on 04/22/2014 5:54:44 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson