Skip to comments.
So Why is Mark Steyn No Longer at National Review?
04.19.14
| chickensoup
Posted on 04/19/2014 4:48:06 PM PDT by Chickensoup
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-98 next last
To: okie01
Climate change has nothing to do with why Steyn was sacked. Steyn wrote a column that repeated a Bob Hope joke. The Editor said it was evil and homphobic and he didn’t want Steyn spewing his homophobia at NR.
To: SoothingDave
Put another way, NR is staffed by timid, salaried gopee eunuchs while Steyn is a human Tasmanian Devil, a conservative dynamo with balls like church bells.
So to speak.
42
posted on
04/19/2014 6:30:24 PM PDT
by
tumblindice
(to hell with the US Chamber of Commerce)
To: nickcarraway
What was the joke? Can you post it?
43
posted on
04/19/2014 7:05:44 PM PDT
by
PhiloBedo
(You gotta roll with the punches and get with what's real.)
To: tumblindice
Never seen so many `comments removed by moderator’ on any thread I’ve ever read on FR.
“Mark Steyn is a vicious homophobe.” So, what’s the big deal, at NR or anywhere else? I don’t get it.
To: trisham
To: elcid1970
Blame the FR troll who shall not be named. Nothing to see here. Move along.
46
posted on
04/19/2014 7:33:10 PM PDT
by
VRWC For Truth
(Roberts has perverted the Constitution)
To: Chickensoup
He didn’t know how to make a fruit cordial.
47
posted on
04/19/2014 7:42:46 PM PDT
by
pluvmantelo
(Sure would be nice if the same articles weren't posted multiple times)
To: Chickensoup
48
posted on
04/19/2014 7:49:54 PM PDT
by
Jane Long
(While Marxists continue the fundamental transformation of the USA, progressive RINOs assist!)
To: trisham
I like DeMille too-—”Plum Island” was my favorite.
.
49
posted on
04/19/2014 7:55:59 PM PDT
by
Mears
To: Chickensoup
Why are so many comments on this thread being deleted?
50
posted on
04/19/2014 8:00:59 PM PDT
by
Starstruck
(If my reply offends, you probably don't understand sarcasm or criticism...or do.)
To: Starstruck
See #46. You are missing nothing.
51
posted on
04/19/2014 8:23:51 PM PDT
by
VRWC For Truth
(Roberts has perverted the Constitution)
To: VRWC For Truth
OK. Since there were several in a row on all of them, I thought it was a back and forth going on. If it was one dude posting repetitious crap I can see the deletions. I’m just a curious dude.
52
posted on
04/19/2014 8:30:22 PM PDT
by
Starstruck
(If my reply offends, you probably don't understand sarcasm or criticism...or do.)
To: Starstruck
Nah, just a poster getting his due beat down.
53
posted on
04/19/2014 8:32:33 PM PDT
by
VRWC For Truth
(Roberts has perverted the Constitution)
To: Starstruck
Why are so many comments on this thread being deleted?
********
I don’t know. This thread is like production on a FOIA request.
54
posted on
04/19/2014 11:10:39 PM PDT
by
Psalm 144
(FIGHT! FIGHT! SEVERE CONSERVATIVE AND THE WILD RIGHT!)
To: okie01
1. Steyn wrote something negative about Global Warmist Michael Mann in National Review.
2. Michael Mann sued Steyn and National Review for slander.
3. National Review wanted to settle the suit. Steyn wanted to pursue a counter-suit.
4. They agreed to go their separate ways.
_____________
Well that clears it up. NR is no McCLeans is it?
55
posted on
04/20/2014 1:47:44 PM PDT
by
Chickensoup
(Leftist totalitarian fascism is on the move.)
To: Aria
I have never heard of this author, I will remedy this as quickly as possible.
56
posted on
04/20/2014 1:50:47 PM PDT
by
Chickensoup
(Leftist totalitarian fascism is on the move.)
To: Chickensoup
NR is no McCLeans is it? Nor a Western Standard.
57
posted on
04/20/2014 1:50:57 PM PDT
by
okie01
To: trisham
Steyn’s eyes, but not his ears.
Cute!
58
posted on
04/20/2014 1:51:31 PM PDT
by
Chickensoup
(Leftist totalitarian fascism is on the move.)
To: nickcarraway
Really a Bob Hope Joke?
I am not sure about this. NR had an interesting column on transgenders recently that said the things no one else is willing to say.
59
posted on
04/20/2014 1:53:05 PM PDT
by
Chickensoup
(Leftist totalitarian fascism is on the move.)
To: tumblindice
Post 41 & 42 ‘explain it’.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-98 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson