Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/19/2014 2:49:05 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: BuckeyeTexan

——Moderator Marvin Kalb-——

More correctly” the partizan leftist Marvin Kalb”

He never moderates


71 posted on 04/20/2014 4:54:43 AM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... History is a process, not an event)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

“Temporary delusions, prejudices, excitements, and objects have irresistible influence in mere questions of policy. And the policy of one age may ill suit the wishes or the policy of another. The constitution is not subject to such fluctuations. It is to have a fixed, uniform, permanent construction. It should be, so far at least as human infirmity will allow, not dependent upon the passions or parties of particular times, but the same yesterday, to-day, and for ever.”

— Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution, 1833


83 posted on 04/20/2014 6:00:21 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

“Every word employed in the Constitution is to be expounded in its plain, obvious, and common sense, unless the context furnishes some ground to control, qualify, or enlarge it. Constitutions are not designed for metaphysical or logical subtleties, for niceties of expression, for critical propriety, for elaborate shades of meaning, or for the exercise of philosophical acuteness or judicial research. They are instruments of a practical nature, rounded on the common business of human life, adapted to common wants, designed for common use, and fitted for common understandings. The people make them, the people adopt them, the people must be supposed to read them, with the help of common-sense, and cannot be presumed to admit in them any recondite meaning or any extraordinary gloss.”

— Joseph Story, Constitution (5th ed.) 345, SS 451.


84 posted on 04/20/2014 6:01:21 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan
"That's why I say its foolish to have us make the decision because I don't know how serious the danger is in this NSA stuff, I really don't."

Perhaps oral argument before the Supreme Court might shed some light on that, Justice Scalia.

97 posted on 04/20/2014 3:44:07 PM PDT by Colonel_Flagg ("Compromise" means you've already decided you lost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson