[Mariner]

" And they boasted about the fact that they put women in children — in fact one retired sheriff from Arizona boasted that he put women and children so that they would get hit first."

What in the hell is this?

Does Sheriff Mack have a civil case here?

[Mariner]

"Does Sheriff Mack have a civil case here? "

And if so, that would make all of Harry's motives, records, associations and communications subject to subpena.

[Karl Spooner]

Does Sheriff Mack have a civil case here?

No. He did imply that he made a suggestion or was going to make a suggestion to that effect. It's irrelevant. No women and children were in front. After Waco, where does the government get off taking the moral high ground on something like this anyway?

[Repeat Offender]

Probably not. It would be the same ruling as when Murtha (spit) slandered the Marines and proclaimed their guilt before the trials.

Our "betters" can say and do as they please.

[Hulka]

“put women and children so that they would get hit first.”

It was the sheriff that made the claim he was told this, he didn’t say he made that statement or directed that alleged action.

Most importantly, that claim was vehemently denied by a documentary film producer that was on the front lines, out front filming.