Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blueplum
It appears there are two more solar energy zones.

US interior secretary announces additional solar energy zone

The Western Solar Plan, approved in October 2012, created 17 Solar Energy Zones with incentives for development within those zones and a process for considering additional zones. Interior approved an 18th Solar Energy Zone in January, with the Arizona Restoration Design Energy Project. The West Chocolate Mountains REEA is the third Solar Energy Zone in California and brings the national total to 19.
32 posted on 04/18/2014 8:34:59 PM PDT by Girlene (Hey, NSA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Girlene

(I don’t know what they’re calling the farm at 29stumps, that I saw a few months, but that is probably one of the total, also).

found this map:
http://www.energy.ca.gov/33by2020/documents/renewable_projects/REAT_Generation_Tracking_Projects_Map.pdf

also, chocolate mountains:

1.2 pg 86 All acquired Catellus lands were conveyed to the U.S. by S.F. Pacific Properties, Inc. a Delaware corporation, by Grand Deed for valuable consideration ($), or by donation (gift). Lands were acquired with LWCF appropriations by Congress and by funds from the Wildlands Conservancy, a non-profit corporation. Catellus sold lands to the BLM at a bulk discount / per acre value below appraised value. Wildlands funded all transactions which were a donation to the BLM. Wildlands was not paid any LWCF money since the lands were owned by S.F. Pacific Properties. Wildlands lobbied Congress for LWCF money and contributed money from donors to fund the purchases. Later acquisition phases involved the transfer of all mineral and oil and gas rights from S.F. Pacific to Wildlands prior to the transfer of the surface rights to the BLM. These rights are currently held by Wildlands (split estate) and the BLM owns the surface only on some properties.

1.9.1 (pg 105) The BLM sought and received permission from the Secretary of the Interior to issue a notice of proposed withdrawal for the West Chocolate Mountains REEA (public notice forthcoming in the Federal Register). In effect as of the date of publication, the proposed withdrawal would segregate 22,562 acres of public lands in the REEA for up to two years from surface entry and mining...

http://www.blm.gov/pgdata/etc/medialib/blm/ca/pdf/elcentro/nepa/fy11/wcm.Par.59394.File.dat/WCM_REEA_FEIS_Volume_1.pdf

other verbage:

These impacts could include a conflict with existing federal, state, and local land uses, plans, and policies; conflicts with existing BLM land use authorizations; changes in public land disposition; restriction of the land use authorizations of the BLM; restriction of land tenure adjustments; or restrictions on livestock and grazing management.

Up to about 50,000 acres of land could ultimately be developed for renewable energy at the West Chocolate Mountains REEA. In addition, tens of thousands of other acres of other BLM and non-BLM land could be developed in the foreseeable future. If all of these projects were to be developed, they would cause a cumulative impact to recreational use in the region...

....Further, given that many people live in the area because of its rural character, projects approved under the West Chocolate Mountains REEA EIS, combined with other changes in the landscape, may permanently alter the rural feel of the community.


33 posted on 04/18/2014 11:14:45 PM PDT by blueplum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson