[neverdem]

Mark Warner can be hammered for being a gun grabber, i.e. Manchin Toomey Amdt. last April, Sotomayor and Kagan votes for SCOTUS.

[gorush]

I don’t dislike bipartisanship necessarily, but what position do today’s democrats hold on any single issue that makes sense?

[Steely Tom]

"Whea kin ah get me a day-um huntin' license?"

[MUDDOG]

But Warner, who faces a competitive reelection race this year because of a challenge from former Republican National Committee Chairman Ed Gillespie, isn't like most Democrats.

He will be when he loses like them this year.

[KoRn]

That weasel bastard has never seen a bad piece of legislation he hasn’t voted for.

If there has EVER been a ‘yes man’ for 0bama, he IS IT!

[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

Gillespie is going to lose. Status-quo, typical squish Republican.

I wish Republicans would run on genuine freedom, liberty, tax code reform, abolishing entire agencies and departments, and completely change the narrative. Instead, they get locked down into these ridiculous back-and-forth defensive arguments that they're not all that mean, and they want to spend just as much money "helping" people albeit more responsibly or such BS.

Notice that Warner is running a positive, focused campaign about his accomplishments.

[WayneS]

Mr. Warner supports Obama’s agenda 100%.

He opposed George W Bush about 95% of the time.

If that is “bipartisan” then I am the King of Suam.

[Impy]

Any time they’ll need his vote, they’ll have it.

[Theodore R.]

I wouldn’t be surprised if a discouraged Gillespie doesn’t soon leave the race and endorse Warner.