Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kackikat

Since they could have provide tax credits for insurance premiums at about 1/3 of what was spent,

without the intrusiveness and control over our medical system,

it’s obvious that the intrusiveness and control were the ACTUAL goal.


73 posted on 04/18/2014 9:00:39 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: MrB

Oh I agree, but I like to keep reminding people how simple it could have been...lest anyone forget how greedy and controlling the left is. We know the left has lurkers here.

The change in selling insurance across state lines like auto insurance would have lowered costs for many Americans. So tax credits, and across state lines would have been simple fixes that would not have cost us, like you said, more than a third of what we now have in this boondoggle known as Obama Care.

I think the right decisions would have saved and created jobs and saved the insured from all these debilitating costs when their health insurance was cancelled, because so many families cannot afford the new premiums.


74 posted on 04/18/2014 9:06:54 AM PDT by Kackikat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson