Quote a from a real scientific publication’s real article not built on a straw man and we’ll talk.
Quote a from a real scientific publication’s real article not built on a straw man and we’ll talk.
So, based on that remark I’m gonna guess you buy into AGW.
Sorry, but he said “real scientific publications”.
Those that are pushing AGW are most definitely not even close to scientific...for N reasons...where N is a very very large number. Always remember, if you’ve got Cs and Ds in your physics courses, you can always get a government grant and go into something that’s your level....climate research.
>>So, based on that remark I’m gonna guess you buy into AGW.<<
You would be 100% wrong. AGW meets exactly zero Scientific Theory criteria. That is why there are scientists that loudly point it out.