“wouldn’t appeal SOME of the findings.”
I wonder if the some means he will not appeal the spelling of his name or time of the day?
From the article, for those who couldn’t/wouldn’t click on the link:
The “corrective statement” agrees to properly represent the judge’s findings in communications with deputies — telling them that mere belief that someone might be in the U.S. illegally doesn’t justify detaining him or her without some other reasonable suspicion that a crime has been committed.
But beyond acknowledging the ruling, the legal filing goes further: It states that while the sheriff’s office will continue its appeal of Snow’s ruling finding racial profiling in traffic stops in general, “we are not appealing the Court’s finding that that MCSO violated the constitutional rights of Latinos during saturation patrols” — in which officers flood a targeted geographic area in a concentrated law enforcement operation.
Moreover, even if the department wins its larger appeal, the finding that Maricopa deputies racially profiled Latinos in the targeted stops “will not be altered,” the statement stipulates.