Science can’t ‘disprove’ God for the same reason it can’t ‘disprove’ anything: Science uses inductive proofs, which are incapable of providing absolute proofs or disproofs. Inductive proofs can only show the probability that a theory is true or false, with said probability never being zero and never bing 100%.
When my kids were growing up and they brought home this “Big Bang” stuff from school, my response was that the big bang was in the Bible - in Genesis.
It was the beginning of the first day...
Aczel is has written some excellent books. They usually pertain to math and science and are written in a manner that even the those who are not geared towards math and science can understand them.
The existence of God or truth in values are beyond the purview of science.
[The most persuasive evidence of God, according to the great philosopher and psychologist William James in his landmark book “The Varieties of Religious Experience” (1902), is not physical or objective or provable. It is the highly personal transcendent experience.]
Take on step toward God and he will take two steps toward you.
Lying comes naturally to liberals. That Dawkins is taken seriously tells you just how vacuous the elites really are. Dawkins presents a simpleminded, one sided argument and it’s considered intellectually robust.
I like being on the side of truth.
The scientists always seem to fall into the mutiuniverse theory. Why is easily understood. By its very nature the theory cannot be proven. So grant money can flow forever and the physicists need never actually prove anything. A good deal if you can get it. Never ending income without ever having to actually accomplish anything.
Psst. Multiuniverse theory is theology.
Consensus IS science-Algore said so.
God is a conscious entity. Since science knows nothing of consciousness, it knows nothing of God.
I do not believe that we are the highest form of consciousness in the universe.
There is plenty of room for the existence of God, and no proof that God does not exist.
Aczel is wrong. He didn't. Einstein was a monistic humanist. He said he believed in "the god of Spinoza" which basically makes him an atheist. Einstein used the term "superpersonal" to describe his god, and this peculiar term was coined by Paul Carus, editor of The Monist journal. Monism, popularized by Ernst Haeckel, was supposed to be a religion for scientists. Monism is a kind of Spinoza-lite pantheism. Many scientists in those times, especially evolutionists, adopted monism and promoted monism.