Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RWGinger
I am just sorry Bundy decided he didn't have to follow the laws and chose this way to act.

Marbury v. Madison. Unconstitutional laws are null and void.

13 posted on 04/14/2014 12:43:43 PM PDT by backwoods-engineer (Blog: www.BackwoodsEngineer.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: backwoods-engineer

What is unconstitutional about the fees the feds were collecting?
I ask because I do not know

That land was federal land before Nevada became a state


17 posted on 04/14/2014 12:49:00 PM PDT by RWGinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: backwoods-engineer

Who decided that the BLM was acting unconstitutionally? Not the courts, Bundy has lost all of his court battles.


20 posted on 04/14/2014 12:51:56 PM PDT by Lou Budvis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: backwoods-engineer

I don’t think that this is a constitutional matter. However, Bundy probably has legal recourse because of the manner in which the new terms and conditions were imposed, and also because of the improper application of remediation measures for the desert tortoise.

Unfortunately, Bundy hasn’t presented these issues as far as I can tell. He has no counsel and he has argued his cockamamie theories of federal ownership that the court has not bought. He is his own worst enemy at this stage.


84 posted on 04/14/2014 4:35:25 PM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson