To: DoodleDawg
I read that as the Federal government protecting the territory of the “United “STATES”” That cannot be interpreted as the Federal government taking over land belonging to a state of the Untied States.
29 posted on
04/14/2014 12:06:59 PM PDT by
GregNH
(If you can't fight, please find a good place to hide!)
To: GregNH
That cannot be interpreted as the Federal government taking over land belonging to a state of the Untied States. I don't think it means that the federal governent can take over land belonging to a state either. But it does not preclude the government owning land and other proptery within the borders of a state.
To: GregNH
The land in question NEVER belonged to the state of Nevada.
To: GregNH
45 posted on
04/14/2014 12:41:47 PM PDT by
MeshugeMikey
( "Never, never, never give up". Winston Churchill ..We WIll Remember Bunkerville!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson