[freedumb2003]

>>BTW Mr. dumb, vehicle #2 which had the right away could say the exact same thing. If BP vehicle #1 could not see the #3 lane where V2 was, he should have never proceeded into the path of V2.<<

That doesn’t change anything. I have been in that exact situation many times and every time I assume the stopped traffic is stopped for a reason.

But that is just me.

[dragnet2]

When the middle lane (to his left) wasn’t moving, Ted should have known something was up. It could have been an old woman in a walker or a duck walking its ducklings. BAD driving by Ted.

BTW Mr. dumb, vehicle #2 which had the right away could say the exact same thing. If BP vehicle #1 could not see the #3 lane where V2 was, he should have never proceeded into the path of V2

That doesn’t change anything.

Of course it does Mr. dumb. It completely obliterates your comment..

Would you pull into the path of the #3 lane which had the green light if you could not see possible on-coming traffic?

[Paladin2]

"I assume the stopped traffic is stopped for a reason."

Yep, some folks could easily know more than you about the current situation on the ground. When driving, it's best to assume people know what they are doing until your are fully assured that they are, in fact, idiots.