To: Valpal1
One more thought. If they arrest him I think an interesting angle would be to argue the BLM is in contempt for NOT rounding the cattle up also. Therefore selective enforcement - judges hate selective enforcement - makes them personally liable.
To: mad_as_he$$
They’ve been claiming he’s been in violation for 20 years, yet only now have they acted. He might have “squatter’s rights.”
120 posted on
04/14/2014 11:39:31 AM PDT by
Cyber Liberty
(H.L. Mencken: "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.")
To: mad_as_he$$
Won’t work, the order orders Bundy to remove, but only authorizes the BLM to do so, they weren’t ordered and they made a good faith attempt at complying.
So that argument won’t fly.
125 posted on
04/14/2014 11:47:39 AM PDT by
Valpal1
(If the police can t solve a problem with violence, they ll find a way to fix it with brute force)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson