I love people on here who can’t see the myriad circumstances under which they could find themselves in similar straits.
That is because most of us apply logic and reason rather then rampant emotionalism.
“can i borrow your pen?” stab someone in the head and hand it back to you mr guilty.
Prime example. If you ask me for a pen so you can stab someone in the head I am not going to lend it to you. If I do then there is something wrong with me.
How about you lend a family member 20 bucks who turns around and solicits a child prostitute? Guess what you little enabler you. Guilty.
Another good example of rampant emotionalism with no logic to back it up. Would I lend $20 bucks to some one who told me that he intended to hire a child prostitute with it? No.
we can go on and on but i’m quite certain that anyone who can say its not the point whether he knew or not will never admit to being wrong.
You certainly can go on and on but you apparently can not see beyond your emoting to the fact that if he knew has everything to do with the case.
In this case you are flat out wrong.
Hey Brainiac.
i wasn’t wrong.
i responded to ‘Sorry but the point is if he did or did not know.”
You see at that point your post was over. You wasted a bunch of typing. You set me up with a line that you never meant and then refute the argument i made to that mistake.
So no. You were wrong.
apology accepted and i don’t need to ever hear another word from you. go play on the Huff Post.