Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: theneanderthal

“Well you seem t have alot of false or confused statements in the text you posted.

Clear enough? No?

You surely have a poorly researched view of the Bundy Ranch situation. Your opening text seems to be a good reason to trash FR for inaccuracies. Hence, ZOT!”


And which are those YOU believe are false? What about my ‘opening text’ is unbelievable to you? Or not clear enough?


51 posted on 04/13/2014 8:46:41 PM PDT by ourworldawry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: ourworldawry

Well?


53 posted on 04/13/2014 8:54:01 PM PDT by ourworldawry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: ourworldawry

“What about my ‘opening text’ is unbelievable to you? Or not clear enough?”

“The Bundy Ranch IS an example of this, except his land has been promised to the chicoms by Hairy Reid and his spawn, so they can build a 700MW solar station there.”

Uh, that was not the location of the chicom project? First line of your second paragraph. You lost me right there at the get go. Clarity is a virtue. Bundy’s land is a mitigation issue. Goobermint bs whereby the chicom, or any other industry can buy a pass by protecting another area rather than the area they’re damaging. Keep it real.


54 posted on 04/13/2014 9:11:32 PM PDT by theneanderthal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson